Consider two types of moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).

Consequentialist Theory Include:


Moral Egoism

Non-consequentialist Theory Include:

Virtue Ethics


Natural Law theory

1) Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?

2) Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here