This must be in your own words, avoid discussing about other companies and what they are done.
This is a plan based on the readings, based on your experiences, on what you would do, not another company.
Please follow the guidelines to avoid having your paper not accepted.
This is the link to the book we are using
https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-management
Final Written Assignment
You have just been hired via external recruiting to lead a new Auto Parts Company with over 40 employees. It has operated under what could be classified as:
- Dysfunctional environment
- Coercive leadership
- Theory X mindset from the prior CEO
- Sexist and Non-diverse
- Lack of trust to employees
- Tattle telling
- Circle of favorites
This is the result of the prior CEO.
This mindset still echoes down the hierarchy.
Based on the readings and discussion forum, outline a plan and list your recommendations as new CEO on how you would restore this company and create a healthy environment.
Outline your plan.
3 Full pages
12 point font.
Times New Roman/Calibri or Arial Font
1.5 spacing
No spacing between paragraphs, please dont pad the paper with your name and misc. info.
Do not copy anything!
Everything should be in your own words.
This is run through a plagiarism checker. TurnItIn Score must be less than 9%.
Please cite per the syllabus as necessary.
Do not place long sentences in quotes and then cite them, they will not be accepted.
Thank you
Rubric for Management and Leadership Plan
|
|
A (4) |
B (3) |
C (2) |
D/F (1/0) |
|
Focus: Management and Leadership purpose |
Management and Leadership purpose is clear |
Shows awareness of Management and Leadership purpose |
Shows limited awareness of Management and Leadership purpose |
No awareness |
|
Management and Leadership Plan |
Clearly presents an Management and Leadership plan and supports it throughout the paper. |
There is a Management and Leadership plan supported throughout most of the paper. |
Vague sense of a Management and Leadership plan, weakly supported throughout the paper. |
No Management and Leadership plan |
|
Organization: Overall |
Well-planned and well-thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion. |
Good overall organization, includes the main organizational tools. |
There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing |
No sense of organization |
|
Organization: Paragraphs |
All paragraphs have clear Management and Leadership ideas, are supported with examples and have smooth transitions. |
Most paragraphs have clear Management and Leadership ideas, are supported with some examples and have transitions. |
Some paragraphs have clear Management and Leadership ideas, support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak. |
Para. lack clear Management and Leadership ideas |
|
Content |
Exceptionally well-presented and argued; Management and Leadership plans are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details. |
Well-presented and argued; Management and Leadership plans are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific. |
Content is sound and solid; Management and Leadership plans are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. |
Content is not sound |
|
Style: Details and Examples |
Large amounts of specific examples and detailed descriptions of Management and Leadership plan. |
Some use of specific examples and detailed descriptions. May have extended examples that go on for too long for Management and Leadership plan. |
Little use of specific examples and details; mostly generalized examples and little description of Management and Leadership plan. |
No use of examples |
|
Grammar & Mechanics |
Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation. |
A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many. |
Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading. |
Continuous |
Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here
